Citizenship has to do with natural allegiances. “Natural” and “native” are terms used in national and international law regarding citizenship. Citizenship allegiance is tied to the land where one’s parents are from. A “natural-born citizen” refers to biological birth, not geographical birth. “Native-born” refers to geographical allegiance. If a person becomes naturalized he goes through a lawful change of allegiance from one country to another. If a child is born after the parent is naturalized the new allegiance applies to the child as well.
If an invader gives birth during an invasion no allegiances change for the child anymore than for the invader. The child is tied to the parent by familial bonds. The citizenship does not change by waiting long enough. There is no time limit on prosecution. Though it may not be considered a heinous crime it is still a crime to invade what is not your own home. A country is a home.
At no time or place in history was invasion considered a legitimate form of citizenship. There was either a first time occupation of land, war or treaties with other parties making claims.
Although the U.S. government has been negligent at best and treasonous at worst regarding defense of its international borders, the primary guilt still resides with the direct perpetrators, the invaders. The invasion has been to the tune of 30-40 million. If they had been wearing military uniforms instead of coming dressed as civilians do you think government would notice?
This is treachery to the owners of the country, the people. It does damage to them by stealing from them their resources to conduct their lives without being undermined with crowding, extra costs, job losses, dilution of resources, undermining of wages, etc. All the unpleasant thing that would not be there normally. It also does damage to the invaders’ country by taking pressure off their government to deal with its problems rather than sluff those problems off onto the U.S.A. and its tax payers.
The job market gets undermined. When the lowest wages get lowered even more the entire wage scale gets pulled down because there are more and more people who will do-it-for-less just to have a job at all.
There is a hierarchy in the laws.
First is the Creator of the universe. (whether you believe or not)
He created mankind with natural inalienable rights.
Human rights are the only settled law.
Then came the States and their jurisdiction who created the U.S. Constitution and its jurisdiction.
Then came the lower laws and statutes, which may not violate the higher laws or they are null and void at inception.
People must demand this order. Government always tends toward violating this order. Why? Because people tend toward corruption as they try to increase their dominance, power and paychecks.
The oath of office requires upholding the Constitution. The Constitution and the laws are never to be interpreted. The case is interpreted, not the Constitution. The Constitution was written so that an 18th century farmer could understand it. There is no excuse for a supreme court justice to not understand it. The Constitution is to be applied to the case, not interpreted.
The job description requires someone who will be honest in keeping their own politics out of their decisions. Their job is to apply the Constitution’s standards to the case, not give out a personal opinion or preference.
A justice MUST be honest. Saying “on means off” or “dead means alive” is not acceptable. The reward for such behavior needs to be immediate impeachment.
When some justices are called “conservative”, “originalist” or “strict constructionist” that merely acknowledges that they are honest and NOT chiselers to some degree. That is because their oath requires them to uphold the Constitution, not change it or pretend it changed itself.
Liberal, leftist or adherents of a “living constitution” are by definition NOT honest, because they are not upholding the actual Constitution. A constitution is a contract just like a mortgage contract. How far do you think you would get pretending your home mortgage is living and breathing?
The States created the Constitution. The Constitution created the federal government. Any power not given to the federal government in the Constitution does not exist. You can pretend along with some politicians that it exists, but it does NOT exist. The Constitution can be changed by 4/5 of the States with amendments.
All lower laws must comply with higher laws. All laws must comply with the Constitution. No law can be deemed or proclaimed by a politician. They must be passed by Congress and legislatures.
A judge at any governmental level MUST be honest. Judges must interpret a case by the Constitution and other applicable lower laws, no other way.
These cities are acting treasonous. They argue that they won’t “enforce” federal immigration law. No one is requiring them to enforce, just to cooperate. They aren’t being required to hunt down illegal aliens, they are required to just turn them over when they have them in their hands anyway from an arrest or conviction. Cities are corporate agencies created by States. States are members of the federal union who created the federal jurisdiction to manage immigration policies. To have an agency of the State subvert the State’s own creation makes no sense.
Another issue arises with the attorney general’s threat to withhold “federal funds” to cities. Federal funds are not supposed to come back to cities in the first place. All federal funds are to be raised by the States and only used for federal jurisdiction purposes. No meddling in domestic policy is allowed in the U.S. Constitution which is a contract with the States.
Federal funds being used for bribery of cities is a stunt from 20th Century political corruption. Using a holdback of federal funds now is a temporary stopgap measure only because it is the situation we are in (created by years of law violating politicians).
The appropriate response to city officials undermining federal immigration policy is for officials to be individually charged with conspiracy to sabotage legitimate federal jurisdiction. Cities have no immigration jurisdiction. States only have it if the feds shirk their duty.
A typical charge could be for “knowingly harboring an illegal border violator”, or whatever wording they would use.
Money is the medium for transfer of value from one place to another. There are many different ways to transfer value. The federal politicians transfer the value of your work to the Federal Reserve. The Fed takes a percentage of it for themselves then sells the paper money to the U.S. Treasury. They bill Congress through the Treasury every time they print. They take a percentage. This makes for permanent debt.
When the Congress creates deficit budgets every year they steal value out of your money. By printing or digitizing more money in the federal money supply than the value that was actually there, they devalue the dollar and inflate the money supply. This is called inflation even though the dollar is deflated. When the money supply (M1) is inflated the dollar is deflated ($). This is because the value in the economy is relatively stable but the money supply increases.
It is as if there were only one dollar bill in the world and that dollar represented a candy bar’s value. Then the Fed prints another dollar into the money supply so now your dollar is suddenly worth only half a candy bar.
The difference is that the amounts are actually in the billions and trillions.
Another difference is that the additional paper dollars are “eased” into the money supply over time, so that the value change is not so quickly noticed. This is called “quantitative easing” by economists. It is called “highway robbery” by those who are aware.